Artificial Intelligence - Intelligenza Artificiale
TalkCommon Knowledge, WikiThing, HelpThing
Join LibraryThing to post.
1AntonioGallo
Does AI make us more intelligent or more artificial?
Ma l'Intelligenza Artificiale ci fa più intelligenti o più artificiali?
Ma l'Intelligenza Artificiale ci fa più intelligenti o più artificiali?
2gilroy
Uh I honestly think this is asked in the wrong group, but let me see.
Artificial intelligence neither makes us more artificial nor more intelligent. It simply is an extension of the ability to create life.
Artificial intelligence neither makes us more artificial nor more intelligent. It simply is an extension of the ability to create life.
3AntonioGallo
This is really an "intelligent" answer in an "artificial" group
4aspirit
This is really an intelligent "answer" in an artificial "group".
>1 AntonioGallo: Both.
If this topic were in a group such as Big Picture, I would say that integrated with it as humans are, AI in its many forms helps us process information and adapt quickly to changing environmental conditions. That's the same as what higher intelligence does. However, we're also modifying our behavior and destroying natural resources our species depends on for survival to better accomodate machine learning, which appears to lead to artificial evolution for to further depend on intelligent machines to maintain our populations.
Now, here in the CK group, I will say that LibraryThing's automated systems don't meet any current definitions of AI, as far as I'm aware. So I'm confused by the question's presence here.
>1 AntonioGallo: Both.
If this topic were in a group such as Big Picture, I would say that integrated with it as humans are, AI in its many forms helps us process information and adapt quickly to changing environmental conditions. That's the same as what higher intelligence does. However, we're also modifying our behavior and destroying natural resources our species depends on for survival to better accomodate machine learning, which appears to lead to artificial evolution for to further depend on intelligent machines to maintain our populations.
Now, here in the CK group, I will say that LibraryThing's automated systems don't meet any current definitions of AI, as far as I'm aware. So I'm confused by the question's presence here.
5AntonioGallo
>4 aspirit: "LibraryThing's automated systems don't meet any current definitions of AI, as far as I'm aware. So I'm confused by the question's presence here." I believe that what you call "automated systems" is already a preliminary part of AI
6aspirit
>5 AntonioGallo: Yes, a part. The difference is that AI learns. An automated system that will perform the same action given the same parameters regardless of its overall experiences isn't intelligent.
7SandraArdnas
What about a human intelligence and lack thereof? Can it master the convoluted art of posting in a relevant group?
8AntonioGallo
>7 SandraArdnas: You need AI to do that ...
9SandraArdnas
What a conundrum. How are humans, who are incapable of a task program AI to accomplish the said task? I think we should all self-destruct. Initiating in 10, 9,...
10AntonioGallo
>9 SandraArdnas: As a matter of fact, we are ...
11SandraArdnas
Not fast enough for what I have in mind
12AntonioGallo
"The weight of this sad time we must obey,
Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say.
The oldest have born most; we that are young
Shall never see so much, nor live so long"
(King Lear 5 iii)
Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say.
The oldest have born most; we that are young
Shall never see so much, nor live so long"
(King Lear 5 iii)