Picture of author.

Jean d'Ormesson (1925–2017)

Author of The Glory of the Empire

91+ Works 1,608 Members 29 Reviews 1 Favorited

About the Author

Jean Bruno Wladimir François de Paule Le Fèvre d'Ormesson was born in Paris, France on June 16, 1925. He studied philosophy at the École Normale Supérieure. In 1950, he joined Unesco (the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) in Paris as the head of its international show more council for philosophy and humanistic studies. From 1974 to 1977, he was the publisher of Le Figaro, the conservative French daily newspaper. His first book, L'Amour Est un Plaisir, was published in 1956. He published 40 works of fiction during his lifetime including Goodbye and Thank You and La Gloire de l'Empire, which received the Académie Française Grand Prix award. As a member of the Académie Française, he sponsored the first woman to join its elite numbers. He died from a heart attack on December 5, 2017 at the age of 92. (Bowker Author Biography) show less
Image credit: Jean d'Ormesson en 2007

Series

Works by Jean d'Ormesson

The Glory of the Empire (1971) 197 copies
Histoire du Juif errant (1990) — Author — 133 copies
Au plaisir de Dieu (1974) 93 copies
La Douane de mer (1993) 62 copies
C'était bien (2003) 53 copies
Le rapport Gabriel (1999) 50 copies
Le Vent du soir (1985) 48 copies
Casimir mène la grande vie (1997) 43 copies
Et moi, je vis toujours (2018) 36 copies
Comme un chant d'espérance (2014) 32 copies
Qu'ai-je donc fait ? (2008) 32 copies
Une fête en larmes (2005) 32 copies
La Création du monde (2006) 31 copies
Voyez comme on danse (2001) 30 copies
Odeur du temps (2007) 26 copies
Dieu, sa vie, son oeuvre (1980) 25 copies
Le bonheur à San Miniato (1987) 23 copies
Album Chateaubriand (1988) 21 copies
Garçon, de quoi écrire (1989) 13 copies
The Conversation (2011) 12 copies
Dieu, les affaires et nous (2015) 10 copies
OEuvres (2015) 10 copies
Un amour pour rien (1978) 9 copies
Un Hosanna sans fin (2018) 7 copies
Jean Schlumberger. (1991) — Author — 6 copies
Du coté de chez Jean (1978) 5 copies
Œuvres (Tome 2) (2018) 5 copies
L'amour est un plaisir (1985) 4 copies
La gloire de l'empire II (1977) 4 copies
Les illusions de la mer (1977) 3 copies
Au revoir et merci (1976) 2 copies
Mad About the Girl (1988) 2 copies
Cebrail raporu (2000) 1 copy
Œuvres I, II (2018) 1 copy

Associated Works

1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die (2006) — Préface, some editions — 1,686 copies
Haute Cuisine [2012 film] (2013) 14 copies
André Gide, Jules Romains, Correspondance, 1908-1946. L'individu et l'unanime (1992) — Présentation, some editions — 3 copies
Le Débat, No. 135, Comment enseigner le français (2005) — Contributor — 2 copies

Tagged

1001 (35) 1001 books (21) 1001 books you must read before you die (13) 1DBF (11) 21st century (11) anthology (18) autobiography (12) bibliography (41) bibliophilia (20) biography (19) book (18) book lists (25) books (188) books about books (178) books and reading (23) ebook (14) essay (10) essays (12) fiction (76) France (27) French (28) French literature (75) history (15) library (13) lists (49) literary criticism (67) literature (218) non-fiction (286) novel (33) own (30) read (24) reading (79) reference (322) reviews (12) Roman (81) roman français (17) SO (11) to-read (99) unread (14) wishlist (18)

Common Knowledge

Members

Reviews

The greatest strength of The Glory of the Empire lies in Jean d'Ormesson's general observations, and its weakness lies in its specifics.

History is only useful if we attempt to learn from it. Memorizing names, places, and dates does nothing to improve anybody. We have to look at why things happened the way they did, how these things affect the present day, and how we can avoid making the same mistakes our predecessors made.

In this light, the idea of writing a fake history book, a text based entirely on the rise and fall of a completely fabricated civilization, has a whole lot of potential. If d'Ormesson is to present a realistic fake empire, he needs to have at least some hypothesis to test against history's big questions. And in general, he succeeds in at the very least showing us he's thinking about those questions.
There is something dispiriting about the march of history. That web which never alters despite an infinite range of motifs and variations: the same struggle for power under ever-different masks; the vain triumphs, the declines and falls; the ever-recurring myths; the straining toward a future that, though it always eludes the grasp, never ceases to exert its pressure and make its demands; the turning wheel which changes yet does not change; the hopes always disappointed, the victories foredoomed to failure - whether the picture they paint of man expresses his greatness or his weakness, we shall never know. Both, probably - and both at the same time. Nothing is more futile than history, and yet history is man himself. Nothing is more accidental, nothing more necessary. Everything could probably have been otherwise. But everything is as it is, and forever.
I imagine that's a bit sobering for historians, but I like it.

Writing a history book that doesn't need to be true allows d'Ormesson to editorialize when he wants, and that's to the benefit of this novel. However, when you're writing a novel, something is always required that isn't always crucial to writing true history: it's got to be compelling.

It's nice when a historian is a good writer, but if you're covering the history of Etruscan coins or something, I'm not going to complain if things get a little dry. But if you get to make the whole thing up, it's on you to deliver something engaging. In this regard, d'Ormesson is far more hit-and-miss.

He's got some great passages.
Death was all around him. He was like an island lashed at on every side by the waves. Death was attacking, the island still stood out for a few moments above the seething breakers, then it was overwhelmed by them and disappeared forever. He was the emperor of nothingness. These sumptuous colors and shapes, all this magnificence, the hymns of the priests, the swords and lances, the plumed helmets, the palaces around the square, the standards stamped with the Tiger and the ensigns surmounted by the Eagle, the thirst for power and the thirst for gold, even the beauty of the gardens and the sky, even the happiness he felt within him on spring mornings, all the impatience of youth, the friendship of men, ambition, anguish, all, including the pomp and circumstance of history, was nothing but illusion, nothing but the mask covering gulfs that held only silence.
But most of the book isn't like this.

Throughout The Glory of the Empire, d'Ormesson references dozens of real historical figures and places and connects them to his fictional empire. I also sense that part of the appeal of the book is supposed to come from its imitation of and comical winking towards the stylings of famous 19th and 20th century historians. Basically, you're far more likely to enjoy the book if you're a student of history. I was, for a while, and I recognized most of the people and places involved, but that only makes me more sure that this is much more of an impressive achievement than a good book. It's a book I appreciate rather than enjoy, which is OK. I envision this being great for a classroom, but not really for a couch at home.

I didn't have any other opportunity to share my favorite line from the book, so here it is, apropos of nothing.
"The only way to have clean hands is to not have hands. But we have hands, Philocrates."
… (more)
1 vote
Flagged
bgramman | 4 other reviews | May 9, 2020 |
Last year, I was very charmed by a previous book by D’Ormesson (1925-2017), "Un jour je m'en irai sans en avoir tout dit", which despite its sometimes excessive phraseology managed to touch me. This booklet ('a guide for the wanderers/searchers'), must be the last book he wrote before his death, and it is something completely different: it’s a kind of lexicon of his thinking, in short entries, which contain all his wisdom about the world and life. It is a bit dry and short and therefore remains rather shallow, but as we are used from D’Ormesson it contains a lot of ‘bon mots’ and is written in a very melodic French.

What touched again is that, after all the themes of life, suffering, injustice, joy, pleasure, he finally comes to the theme of love. According to him, love is greater than any truth, and he is right. It is of course not surprising that he (again) ends with an outright creed, because D'Ormesson was a professing Christian, albeit at a certain distance from the (Catholic) church. As another reviewer wrote: this book is an elongated 'hosannah' to life.
… (more)
½
 
Flagged
bookomaniac | 2 other reviews | Nov 8, 2019 |
A patchwork of history: no doubt you'll recognise derivation from the histories you know, as I did. A pastiche, a large part of whose charm is the witty insertion of this imagined history into real-world reception. I didn't want to put the book down and look up Proust when he pretends In Search of Lost Time refers to an event of this history at a famous moment in Proust's novel, but I'm still curious to sort that out. There is an endless parade of names who refer, well-known and lesser-known -- a play by Victor Hugo, an invented line of Walt Whitman, and of course Edward Gibbon wrote a book on the empire. It's fun. The history itself often manages to be gripping, although unfortunately the main king didn't come alive for me like other personalities. At appropriate times there is a lyricism which the translation captures, and is quite lovely. The translation seems a feat achieved in itself, and imitates John Dryden's translation where the French original imitates Corneille. There are probably too many love stories involved for a history, although arguably not, and most of them were good ones anyway.

It reflects on empire -- overtly, more in the way of world empire, premodern ideas of universality (and their reception).

Patchy, for me, but now and then magnificent. I want to read again.
… (more)
 
Flagged
Jakujin | 4 other reviews | Feb 24, 2018 |
This is a very strange book. Ostensibly a history of an ancient Mediterranean empire, it is actually entirely fiction (the subtitle is "A Novel, A History"). But d'Ormesson introduces references to real historians, artists, film-makers, and musicians, as in this phrase:"of whom Heidegger and Bertrand Russell both said . . . until Bacon and Descartes," and even includes endnotes of real and fictional historians and literary figures.

The story is of war and peace (mostly war), depravity, religion, philosophy, literature, music, and above all about history: what it is, how we know it, controversies. About three-quarters of the book is devoted to Alexis, the son of Helen, who was the granddaughter of a previous emperor. Raised in the northern woods, he is probably the son of a philosopher who Helen had an affair with during a siege of the town they lived in. Alexis is taunted by his older (half-)brother as a bastard and leaves the town with another philosopher as a tutor after a long talk with his mother. He winds up in Alexandria where he is initiated into a religion that worships the sun and lives life as a libertine. After a scandal involving the horrific death of a temple priestess he had a forbidden affair with, he sets out for Asia determined to atone for his sins and lives a life as an ascetic, learning from all the religions of the continent. He spends years there but is summoned back to be the emperor. He ends up ruling for more than 50 years, over an empire which eventually extends from the Atlantic to the Pacific after a lot of wars and violent conflicts. Ultimately he steps down, conflicted as always.

I have just skimmed the surface of this dense book. It is a work of philosophy, exploring the meaning of history. It bogged down for me at certain spots, but in the end it was fascinating.
… (more)
2 vote
Flagged
rebeccanyc | 4 other reviews | Jun 3, 2016 |

Lists

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
91
Also by
4
Members
1,608
Popularity
#16,036
Rating
3.8
Reviews
29
ISBNs
232
Languages
11
Favorited
1

Charts & Graphs